View Content #2020

Contentid2020
Content Type1
TitleOpinion: Teachers of Ambition
Body
The following is quoted from:
http://www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=02banner.h24
Full text available with free registration.

Does anyone worry these days about teachers’ aspirations—their
professional dreams and expectations for themselves? I’ve come to do so
because I’ve recently read applications in the competition for Teaching
American History grants, the federal program to improve teachers’ and
students’ knowledge of the nation’s past. Because of a confidentiality pledge,
I can’t disclose anything specific about those proposals or the nature of
discussions among my fellow panelists. I can say that the proposals I read
were solid, intelligent, and earnest; some were exciting; many, if funded,
would significantly help fortify the knowledge of some teachers and their
students.

But what troubles me is that inherent in them all were two assumptions now
integral to the way outsiders view teachers and the way teachers view
themselves. The first is the assumption of passivity—the premise that others,
not teachers themselves, must provide teachers with the spur to learning. The
applications contained no indication that the teachers who would benefit by
funded projects were those who had already shown proven initiative to gain
knowledge on their own or clear frustration with the existing limitations on
their knowledge.

No evidence was provided that the teachers were desirous of becoming
better historians as well as better teachers. If the proposals were funded,
participating teachers would be given many opportunities to learn. The
trouble is, as far as I could tell, they weren’t actively seeking them.

The second assumption, which confuses knowledge with assumed
responsibility, is the belief that by becoming better teachers through knowing
more of their subjects, teachers become closer to being full members of their
disciplines, able to assume positions as independent thinkers with their
colleagues.

This assumption comports with the widely held view that teachers teach
students, not subjects, and that because of this they don’t have to be thinkers
in their subjects, but simply conveyers of knowledge about it.

Neither assumption is valid....

The author goes on to discuss possible explanations for these detrimental
assumptions.

Banner, J. Teachers of ambition. Education Week. http://www.edweek.org/ew/
ewstory.cfm?slug=02banner.h24 (8 Sep. 2004).
SourceJames Banner, Education Week
Inputdate2004-09-10 01:00:00
Lastmodifieddate2004-09-10 01:00:00
ExpdateNot set
PublishdateNot set
DisplaydateNot set
Active1
Emailed1
Isarchived1